Conspiracy video explores alien origins of Roswell Rock. A strange object, named the Roswell Rock, is continuing to trigger debate 1. The mystery rock was found in the New Mexico desert close to the infamous site of an alleged UFO crash continues to spark debate. Conspiracy theorists believe it is of alien origins and may have been part of the 'flying saucer' reported in the area back in 1.

They say understanding the rock could finally help them solve the 7. Roswell UFO case. Scroll down for video. A new You. Tube video by alien hunting channel Secure. Team. 10 seeks to explore the mysteries surrounding the Roswell Rock. Conspiracy theorists have suggested it is everything from a part from a UFO to a key to inter- dimensional travel.

ROSWELL ROCK The Roswell Rock was found by Robert Ridge, in September 2. Alien conspiracy theorists have suggested it is everything from a part from a UFO to a key to inter- dimensional travel. Watch From Within Online Hollywoodreporter.

It is said to have perplexing magnetic properties, which haven't been explained by science. If a magnet is held to the north end of the rock, it is said to spin counter- clockwise, with the opposite effect occurring when held at the southern end.  It is also etched with strange symbols, which have been compared to the lunar cycle. They also match perfectly with crop circles that appeared in Chisledon, England on August 2, 1. The rock was found by Robert Ridge, then 5.

September 2. 00. 4. Mr Ridge says he discovered the rock partially buried in the desert sand, near Roswell, new Mexico. Now, a new You. Tube video by alien hunting channel Secure. Team. 10 seeks to explore the mysteries surrounding the object. Many alien conspiracy theorists believe that it is part of the UFO which they believed crashed at Roswell back in the 1. Others believe that the object was left behind on a previous visit by aliens and was the reason the craft that crashed vehicle was in Roswell that day - in order to retrieve the evidence.  And television personality Giorgio Tsoukalos - well know in UFO circles for his History Channel programme Ancient Aliens - has made claims regarding inter- dimensional travel. Secure. Team. 10 is one of the most viewed You. Tube channels, with over 8.

Speaking in the latest video, which has received over 1. Tyler Glockner said: '[The rock] was discovered back in 2.

Roswell, New Mexico, in a basically barren, empty area of desert close to where the infamous Roswell crash occurred.'The rock was very smooth, rounded, and it contained these mysterious symbols that looked to show almost what looks like a lunar cycle of the Moon.'It's been theorised that this rock may have been part of the wreckage from the Roswell crash.'Or, that this rock - which is said to hold some very mysterious powers, was actually left behind by a previous alien visitation, and that the Roswell crash was what occurred when these aliens had come back to Earth to retrieve the mystery rock.' The rock was reportedly discovered partially buried in the desert sand near Roswell, new Mexico, the alleged site of a UFO crash in 1. The rock was found by Robert Ridge (pictured), then 5. September 2. 00. 4The markings match perfectly with crop circles that appeared in Chisledon, England on August 2, 1. ROSWELL UFOS Roswell, New Mexico sprang to international fame on July 8, 1. Over the decades since the discovery, conspiracy theorists have insisted that the debris came from an alien spacecraft, and that the fact was covered up by the military in their secret hangar, Area 5.

The body of former NFL star Aaron Hernandez reportedly tested positive for synthetic marijuana known as 'K2,' an autopsy following his jailhouse suicide revealed.

The continuing belief of alien activity in the area led the Air Force to launch an investigation into the crash in 1. Officials concluded that the 'UFO' was part of a balloon launched into the atmosphere as part of a secret government surveillance programme aimed at the USSR. However, many have refused to accept that explanation, alleging a conspiracy to hide the existence of extra- terrestrial life. The mystery rock is said to have perplexing magnetic properties.

Watch free horror movies online at FrightPix. Watch scary full length feature films, legally, streaming online at FrightPix. Watch Documentary TV series online with help from SideReel! Find links to shows, read episode summaries and reviews, add ratings, and more.

If a magnet is held to the north end of the rock, it is said to spin counter- clockwise, with the opposite effect occurring when held at the southern end. The video claims that X- rays and CT scans have revealed no evidence of mangets placed inside the rock - which would suggest it is a hoax. It is also said to not contain any known natural minerals which would explain its magnetism. The Rockwell Rock is also etched with strange symbols, which have been compared to the lunar cycle. They also match perfectly with crop circles that appeared in Chisledon, England on August 2, 1.

According to the Vancouver Courier, the Stanley Park Ecology Society found the alien-looking lumps—which are actually colonies of tiny marine invertebrates called.

Roswell, New Mexico sprang to international fame on July 8, 1. Roswell, New Mexico sprang to international fame on July 8, 1. The original Roswell hoax alien autopsy pictures, including this one, were unveiled in 1. Over the decades since the discovery, conspiracy theorists have insisted that the debris came from an alien spacecraft, and that the fact was covered up by the military in their secret hangar, Area 5. The continuing belief of alien activity in the area led the Air Force to launch an investigation into the crash in 1. Officials concluded that the 'UFO' was part of a balloon launched into the atmosphere as part of a secret government surveillance programme aimed at the USSR.

However, many have refused to accept that explanation, alleging a conspiracy to hide the existence of extra- terrestrial life.

NOVA - Official Website Carl Sagan on Alien Abduction. Carl Sagan was captivated by the notion of life beyond Earth. Yet in this interview, conducted shortly before the well- known champion of science died in 1.

Sagan says that extraterrestrial intelligence is "a wonderful prospect, but requires the most severe and rigorous standards of evidence." Sagan doubted that the various proponents of so- called "alien abduction" making headlines in the 1. The imagery from Steven Spielberg's 1. Watch Frownland Online. Close Encounters of the Third Kind has continued to influence other visions of alien abduction for decades. Enlarge. a wonderful prospect. NOVA: Speculate for a moment on the parts of human nature, the commonality of believing in abductions, or aliens anyway, and the part of human nature that wants to search for other life forms in the universe.

Carl Sagan: I personally have been captured by the notion of extraterrestrial life, and especially extraterrestrial intelligence, from childhood. It swept me up, and I've been involved in sending space craft to nearby planets to look for life and in the radio search for extraterrestrial intelligence.

It would be an absolutely transforming event in human history. But, the stakes are so high on whether it's true or false that we must demand the more rigorous standards of evidence—precisely because it's so exciting. That's the circumstance in which our hopes may dominate our skeptical scrutiny of the data. So, we have to be very careful. There have been a few instances in the [past]. We thought we found something, and it always turned out to be explicable. So, a kind of skepticism is routinely applied to the radio search for extraterrestrial intelligence by its most fervent proponents.

I do not see [in] the alien abduction situation a similar rigorous application of scientific skepticism by its proponents. Instead, I see enormous acceptance at face value, and leading the witness, and all sorts of suggestions. Plus, the contamination by the general culture of this idea.

It seems to me there is a big difference between the two approaches to extraterrestrial intelligence, although I'm frequently written to [to] say how could I search for extraterrestrial intelligence and disbelieve that we're being visited. I don't see any contradiction at all. It's a wonderful prospect, but requires the most severe and rigorous standards of evidence.

Could you please comment on the part of the quality of the evidence that is put forward by these so- called "abduction proponents.". Well, it's almost entirely anecdote. Someone says something happened to them, and people can say anything. The fact that someone says something doesn't mean it's true. Doesn't mean they're lying, but it doesn't mean it's true.

To be taken seriously, you need physical evidence that can be examined at leisure by skeptical scientists: a scraping of the whole ship, and the discovery that it contains isotopic ratios that aren't present on Earth, chemical elements from the so- called island of stability, very heavy elements that don't exist on Earth. Or material of absolutely bizarre properties of many sorts—electrical conductivity or ductility.

There are many things like that that would instantly give serious credence to an account. But there's no scrapings, no interior photographs, no filched page from the captain's log book. All there are are stories. There are instances of disturbed soil, but I can disturb soil with a shovel. There are instances of people claiming to flash lights at UFOs and the UFOs flash back.

But, pilots of airplanes can also flash back, especially if they think it would be a good joke to play on the UFO enthusiast. So, that does not constitute good evidence. Precisely because of human fallibility, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.". A very interesting example of this sort of thing is the so- called crop circles in England in which wheat and rye and other grains—these beautiful immense circles appeared and then—this was in the '7.

And there were lots of people who said that these were made by UFOs that were landing and that it was too complex or too highly mathematical to be a hoax. And it turns out that two blokes in Southern England, at their regular bar one night, thought it would be a good idea to make a kind of hoax to see if they could lure in UFO enthusiasts. And they succeeded every time—every time an explanation was proferred: a peculiar kind of wind, they then made another one which contradicted that hypothesis. And they were very pleased when it was said that no human intelligence could do this.

That gave them great satisfaction. And for 1. 5 years, they succeeded in these nocturnal expeditions using rope and board—all the technology they needed. And in their 6. 0's, they finally confessed to the press with a demonstration of how it was done. And, of course, the confession received very little play in the media. And the claims of alien influence had received prominent exposure.

In the late 1. 98. John Mack, a respected Harvard Medical School psychiatrist, and Budd Hopkins, an artist turned abduction investigator, fueled interest in the alleged phenomenon.Enlarge. I want you to comment on John Mack. Many of the principle advocates of UFO abduction seem to want the validation of science without submitting to its rigorous standards of evidence. When John Mack talks about parallel universes or other dimensions, he's using scientific ideas. Those have long been in play in the physics and astronomy community. But, there is no evidence for them.

He also criticizes the current paradigm that is the skeptical scientific method. But, this isn't validated. We don't believe it just out of prejudice; we believe it because it works. In the absence of hard, physical evidence about alien abductions, what does science tell us about the plausibility of what these aliens are supposed to do? Well, if you look at the advantages in human technology in just the last few hundred years, the Voyager spacecraft on its way to the stars, compared to what we knew in the time of Charlemagne, let's say, that's less than a thousand years.

And the progress is simply stunning. So, if you postulate the existence of highly technical civilizations, thousands, much less millions of years in our future, unless the hypothesis strongly contradicts known laws of physics, I think you have to say it's possible. So, travel at very high speeds between the stars, that's by no means out of the question. Walking through walls is a little tough for me—I don't see how it could be done. Watch Don Verdean IMDB on this page. And the basic reading program idea of the alien abduction, the paradigm, they seem strangely backward in biology for all their advances in physics, if you take it seriously. Why are they doing breeding one- on- one at such a slow pace?

Why not steal a few humans, sequence our DNA, look at variations and make whatever genetic engineering changes they want. We almost have the ability to do that. It seems naive in terms of molecular biology. If I were speaking to a group of abductees, I think the first thing I would do would be to tell them that I'm sure to many of them the pain that is expressed is genuine.". Precisely because of human fallibility, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Now, I know that Budd Hopkins responds that extraordinary claims require extraordinary investigations. And I have two kinds of responses to that.

There is a claim that a brontosaurus is tramping through the jungles today in the republic of Congo. Should a massive expedition be mounted with government funds to find it, or it is so implausible as not to be worth serious sustained systematic attention? My second point is that to the extent that extraordinary claims require extraordinary investigations, those investigations must be true to the spirit of science. And that means highly skeptical, demanding, rigorous standards of evidence. There's not a hint of that from alien abduction enthusiasts.